Regarding the African doctor remittances - surely the state is picking up the tab for the training and is not getting a slice of the returns? Or am I missing something?
Exactly - the argument presented here is a defense of the indefensible - and a pure example of the exploitative neo colonialism practised across the board by the US and EU (et al)
This is yet another extractive industry - augmented by the education industry which leeches many middle class children from their home countries and renders them misbegotten 'globalists', at home nowhere except on the road
I never thought about it that way: African countries should get a tangible benefit for exporting high skilled professionals. If a country wants to recruit young professionals from us: then they should invest in the country’s institutions. Thus, making this a win win situation
Regarding the African doctor remittances - surely the state is picking up the tab for the training and is not getting a slice of the returns? Or am I missing something?
Exactly - the argument presented here is a defense of the indefensible - and a pure example of the exploitative neo colonialism practised across the board by the US and EU (et al)
This is yet another extractive industry - augmented by the education industry which leeches many middle class children from their home countries and renders them misbegotten 'globalists', at home nowhere except on the road
I never thought about it that way: African countries should get a tangible benefit for exporting high skilled professionals. If a country wants to recruit young professionals from us: then they should invest in the country’s institutions. Thus, making this a win win situation
Well researched.
With globalization of labour not much can be done